Don’t Come Around Here No More

Tom Petty was one of the greats not only in music but in music videos as well and with his recent passing, I felt compelled to honor him by discussing one of my favorite music videos. Considering, I’m a real Alice in Wonderland freak, “Don’t Come Around Here No More” is, of course, one of my favorites. The song was a collaborative work between Tom Petty and Eurythmics’ David Stewart released in 1985.

There were many traditional Alice in Wonderland elements throughout the video, such as:


A hookah smoking caterpillar (played by Stewert),


A mad tea party hosted by Tom Petty himself as the mad hatter,


and they even incorporated flamingos. Though, as bows for the cello rather than croquet mallets. There were also some original elements as well,


like Alice being turned into a cake and eaten alive by the party guests.

The video is eye-catching with the creepy masonic checkerboard floor and walls. The chorus girls coordinating full body suits and Tom Petty’s shades make the whole trip seem very rock n roll. The video is just as original as Lewis Carrol’s own Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.

According to “The Atlantic” the Alice in Wonderland theme was inspired by British musician Dave Stewart’s first impression of 1980’s Los Angeles. In the video, Alice is bewildered to find herself among so many strange characters. In one scene a plate of donuts is set in front of Alice and one by one each party guest grabs them up before she even has a chance, a feeling every struggling artisan living in LA could relate to. The end scene in which Alice is turned into a cake rings a bell of a familiar phrase for anyone trying to get by in the city, “They’ll eat you alive!” as Petty sings “Don’t Come Around Here No More…” Knowing the inspiration for the video I can see how one might use Alice in Wonderland as a metaphor for the LA rock scene.

-Jo Resner




“Experiment IV” – Kate Bush

Experiment IV is a song by Kate Bush, released in 1986. The song tells the story of a military organization with the top-secret plan of creating a sound capable of killing someone. The music video is a sci-fi/horror mini-film teeming with originality. It elaborates on the story with a thrill of a plot and an impressive cast of popular English actors including, Dawn French, Peter Vaughn, Richard Vernon, Hugh Laurie and Gary Oldman.

The song by itself is rather disturbing in revealing the whole sinister plot in just the first two verses,

We were working secretly for the military/ Our experiment in sound was nearly ready to begin/ We only know in theory what we are doing/ Music made for pleasure, music made to thrill

It was music we were making here until/ They told us all they wanted/ Was a sound that could kill someone from a distance/ So we go ahead and the meters are over in the red/ It’s a mistake in the making.

The idea that’s expressed here is that music inherently is something for pleasure and then the horror is revealed at the thought of turning something beautiful into something sinister. This is expressed in the music video as well. A video which the U.K found violent enough to ban from Top of the Pops.

The video opens to a man clutching a brief case. He walks into what appears to be a music store, (and there is an Easter egg in here), if you look closely you’ll find the poster for the single of Experiment IV hanging on the wall. You then see him enter a secret room in the back of the music store, suggesting the shop was just a front, into a hospital or laboratory setting where he meets a man and a woman in lab coats (played by Hugh Laurie and Dawn French). As he goes over the material hidden in the brief case with them they appear to be pleased, suggesting they didn’t yet know what they were getting into “We only know in theory what we are doing/ Music made for pleasure, music made to thrill.” That is until they are shown speaking with a military official who explains to them that …all they wanted/ Was a sound that could kill someone from a distance.”

Next it is revealed how the scientists acquire such a deadly sound,

mothers cry

“From the painful cries of mothers…”

terrifying scream

“…to the terrifying scream.”


As you might notice in the first still, the scientists are shown serving tea while misery is going on around them, which is an interesting choice in direction and may show the naivety of the scientists regarding their experiment.

The experiment takes a turn for the worse in the next scene when the test subject, played by Gary Oldman is strapped to a chair with a speaker placed in front of him. Initially, the sound which comes out of the speaker is personified as a beautiful siren-like specter played by Kate Bush herself.Experiment IV Kate

“It could feel like falling in love/ It could feel so bad/ It could feel so good/ It could sing you to sleep.”


But then the specter rips off her beautiful face to reveal a deadly banshee underneath.


“But that dream is your enemy”


The creature then proceeds to murder everyone in the facility as everyone runs about in utter mayhem and the lyrics continue, “We won’t be there to be blamed/ We won’t be there to snitch/ I just pray that someone there can hit the switch.”

Kate Bush appears two more times in the video. She appears serving tea to the military official as the carnage is being revealed. Again, those in authority enjoy their tea while misery surrounds them. This time, however, it may suggest the apathetic attitude the military has toward those they employ. Also in the scene, the camera zooms in on Kate Bush’s face where the face of the banshee flashes over briefly, suggesting that Kate Bush was the creature.

The outside of the facility is revealed at the end of the video where the front of the building reads “Music for Pleasure.” And then the camera zooms out to show a fence around the building with a sign that reads “Prohibited.” The placement of these two signs is almost subliminal as the first sign is shown so quickly. I initially thought that the “Prohibited” sign with the fence meant the building was now prohibited due to all the damage done by the creature. However, with the placement of the two signs it may be that Kate Bush was trying to say, “music for pleasure is now prohibited.”

Kate Bush is shown one more time at the end of the video as the military woman giving the camera a wink with a finger to her lips,

Kate Bush

Suggesting once more that this woman was the creature. She’s just revealed her secret to us and she wants it kept quiet as she hops into a van and rides off to cause more mayhem.

This video is genius. Where the song itself leaves an open ending, the video answers many questions while also creating more mystery. Kate Bush is a master in music cinema. I will likely review more videos by her in the future!

-Jo Resner


“Sacrilege” by the Yeah yeah yeahs

Originally I had planned on “Sacrilege” by the Yeah yeah yeahs as my first music video to review on this site. It only changed last minute before I began to make my first post. I personally think that the Yeah yeah yeahs have some of the best music videos of any artist and “Sacrilege” is probably my favorite among them. “Sacrilege” was released in 2013 and the music video is so well done that it might as well be considered a short film.

Now, I’m a sucker for a music video with a story to it, a plot that could show the song in a new light or bring more clarity to it and boy, does “Sacrilege” have a story. The lyrics of the song are really simple with few words, the first verse as follows “Fallen for a guy, fell down from the sky/ Halo round his head/ Feathers in a bed/ In our bed, in our bed,” this repeats twice, followed by the chorus “It’s sacrilege, sacrilege, sacrilege you say!” The chorus repeats several times and the only other verse is basically the same as the first with one minor change, “Asked if I would try/ To leave this all behind/ Halo round his head/ Feathers in a bed/ In our bed, in our bed.” The Yeah yeah yeahs seem to be using angelic imagery in the lyrics as a woman has “fallen for a guy” with a halo who leaves feathers in their bed. While the lyrics are simple the meaning behind them is rather deep and the video to the song is even more complex.

This is a music video that makes you think.  Rolling Stone called the video “unsettling” and I can’t help but agree. But it’s unsettling in the same way a psychological thriller can mess with your mind.

The first time I saw the video I thought somebody had added movie clips to the song because it looked just like a movie cut into fractions. The second time I watched it, I realized the plot was not only nonlinear, it was going backwards. This made it more interesting to me and I watched it several more times, each time seeing something new about it.

When the video starts all you see is a large fire and several people walking away from it. The video jumps back in time and you see a young woman, half clothed, sitting next to a man wearing a mask whose been shot dead, surrounded by a murderous mob. Through several more of these time jumps you find out that the woman had been having an affair with a priest, the mob hunts them both down. They duct tape a rather sinister looking mask on the priests face, send him running down the road only to shoot him in the back. They then, take the girl and him (who’s already dead) to be burned in the fire.

While the mob are throwing torches on them, the camera pans over all of their faces and it flashes to the woman having sexual encounters with each person, including one other woman. For the final affair she is shown in a wedding dress, time then jumps to her getting married in a church. The man she is marrying you now see for the first time, he wasn’t in the mob or in any of the sexual encounters shown and of course the man conducting the ceremony is the same man she originally had an affair with. The whole mob is there as well, watching with smiling faces. The video ends with several shots of the church doors closing, flashing a large cross repeatedly as they do so.

Dictionary.com defines sacrilege as “the violation or profanation of anything sacred or that is held sacred.” This is important because the music video revolves around the idea of “sacrilege.” There were times in history when certain sacrilegious practices were punishable by death, much like the characters in this video were. But this video is not set in medieval times, based on the clothes and scenery it appears to be a very modern setting. However, the opening scene of the young women with her hands tied, sitting in the middle of a fire brings to mind the image of a witch being burned at the stake. Obviously, her sin was sleeping with a priest while the priest’s sin was breaking his vows of celibacy. And we can’t forget that the woman was married to a man who had no part in these executions.

This brings me to the flashbacks of her encounters with the people involved. Reading the YouTube comments for the video, there’s some debate as to whether these flashbacks were real occurrences or fantasies each of the people had about her. It’s interesting to me that she seems to be playing a role in each flashback that suits the person involved. She’s the conservatively dressed housewife for the older man, the bored teenager chewing bubble gum in the back of a car for the young man, for the mechanic she’s the tease running naked through his shop in broad daylight. She’s the classy lady drinking wine in the bathtub with the well-dressed gentleman who’s later seen fighting with his wife. The wife is in the next encounter, obviously representing the unhappily married woman with unfulfilled desires. The final flashback is with the town sheriff who, earlier in the video, is seen shooting the priest in the back. Now he’s seen with her in the bathroom on her wedding day in the very dress she was married in, the ultimate betrayal.

The question that plagues my mind when I watch the video and think in terms of this idea of “sacrilege” is, what’s the sacred object being violated here? The literal answer would be the priest since he is a sacred person. This could explain why they hid his face with a mask before they shot him, the mask looking demonic as a symbol of the priest’s sins. The lyrics “Fallen for a guy/ fell from the sky,” could allude to a fallen angel, much like the priest fell from sacrament by violating his vows.

However, since they all coveted the women so, perhaps she is considered sacred in their eyes. Perhaps the sacred object was their very own desires, the fantasies they held onto which were shattered at the realization that their fantasy was someone else’s reality. They then proceeded to destroy the couple as a way of destroying their own unfulfilled perversions.

This music video is the most intriguing I’ve ever witnessed and there are definitely multiple ways of looking at it. Feel free to comment if you have other ideas to add.



Dire Straits – Money for Nothin’


I’m not going to lie, I chose my first music video to review mostly based on its references to MTV. I just can’t resist the begging call of “I want my…I want my I want my MTV!” A phrase which became so popular many know the song by those lyrics alone. The song, in fact, is “Money for Nothing” and was written and performed by British rock band Dire Straits.

While the MTV reference is my reason for choosing “Money for Nothing” as my first music video review, it is not my sole reason for reviewing it. The video is also important to mention in terms of cinematic history as it exemplifies one of the early attempts at using computer graphic animation. According to the band’s founder Mark Knopler, the song was inspired by an overheard conversation in a hardware store, in which two store employees were watching MTV and making comments about the rock stars and the scene plays out similarly in the animation of the music video.

The video starts off with a “regular Joe” kinda guy, in vintage CGI glory, watching MTV with his dog. Suddenly he is sucked into the television where footage of Dire Straits plays. Their instruments and athletic headbands glow neon in the classic 80s style.

After which you are taken to the store where average Joe and his chubby coworker are unloading boxes while discussing the rock stars on the televisions around them, “Now look at them yo-yo’s that’s the way you do it/ You play the guitar on the MTV/ That ain’t workin’ that’s the way you do it/ Money for nothin’ and chicks for free.”

The video goes back and forth between footage of the band playing on television sets and the animation of the two store employees with all the neon and bright colors that the 80s were about. Then something comes out of left field and the TVs flash to a completely fictional music video, the TV screen reads Ian Pearson Band “Sally” and a woman in lingerie flashes across the screen while the chubby store employee points to the screen as if commenting, “Look at that mama, she got it stickin’ in the camera/
Man we could have some fun/ And he’s up there, what’s that? Hawaiian noises?/ Bangin’ on the bongoes like a chimpanzee.” The reason this part of the video seems completely random is because the song had to be edited for the video as the original verse caused a lot of controversy among the politically correct. The original verse here went, “See the little faggot with the earring and the makeup/ Yeah buddy that’s his own hair/ That little faggot got his own jet airplane/ That little faggot he’s a millionaire.” I only mention it because I think it’s important to note that these lines are spoken by the “average Joe” narrator. The store employees are making comments at the band (aka Dire Straits) playing on MTV, which would mean these lines were referring to the band members themselves as the “faggots.” I’m not even going to get into why PC police censor a band for calling themselves “faggots” by replacing it with a half-naked woman, while a man makes objectifying comments but I guess that’s the irony of censorship.

The video then ends with average Joe and his chubby coworker back at his house where the video began and it fades out on “I want my…I want my…I want my EmmmmTeeeeVeeee!”

Overall, this video was top of the line in terms of animation for its time and while I can be nit-picky over censorship, the video went with the song really well. The graphics were clearly thought through in terms of both song lyrics and the history of the song as an overheard conversation. With its early use of computer graphics, the bright colors and glowing instruments, and references to the original music television, this video stands as a symbol for great 80s music videos.

-Jo Resner